that's the only way to a raw-standard,...
that's the only way to a raw-standard, i mean iso-standard.
--
http://matagalatlante.org
login to post comments
L. Nobre G. – Sat, 2005/11/26 – 8:54pm
New forum topics
User login
Browse archives
| Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa | Su |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Recent comments
- From my chair, and my chair
14 weeks 5 days ago - Good point. And I would like
30 weeks 5 hours ago - What prevents DNG or OpenRaw
1 year 29 weeks ago - Here here!
On a similar
1 year 29 weeks ago - Being a KM Maxxum 7D shooter
1 year 29 weeks ago - Bravo!
--
http://www.openraw.
1 year 33 weeks ago - P880 in RAW Mode:
I recently
1 year 33 weeks ago - I agree with your comments
1 year 40 weeks ago - The whole topic is a can of
1 year 40 weeks ago - As you'll see from the
1 year 40 weeks ago
Syndicate
We've got an ISO standard. It is called TIFF/EP. It didn't...
We've got an ISO standard. It is called TIFF/EP. It didn't solve this problem.
What we need is for all hardware and software products to support the only candidate for a common raw format we are likely to have: DNG.
The aim of OpenRAW should be to get the best quality information available to enable the highest-quality conversions of raw formats to DNG. If necessary, this information should identify where the DNG specification needs to be updated, so that it will be publicly documented after conversion.
Once we can convert all raw formats to DNG without losing information, OpenRAW's objectives will be achieved.